and more knocked off the list..
the list
...........................
for those who forgot what the dash looked like removed...
................................
squeeky clutch ... hmmmm
I didn't think it was possible... but here's the problem... they put the bell arm in backwards.edited But I don't think it was the PO, or at least not his fault... it's made backwards
first clue was the zert fitting... it wasn't installed - it's usually on the top, but it wasn't..
thing was, the ring that holds the cup (frame side) was machined into the wrong end. Add to that the hole for the zert was on the bottom.... turning it around solved all its issues.edited Now it can be lubed. I punted on the clip ring - I reduced weight.edited One clip ring
now the clutch works correctly, the difference is one arm is longer then the other - thus in the Corvette, where you don't have as much pedal travel as the truck, it won't work Worst, it sticks to the top of the hole in the firewall.
now it doesn't
In other news, and not on that list.. noise
and a way to test it
..................................
105db at 50 feet and 50 mph.... it idles at 100 db..... hmmm
You lost me on the clutch bellcrank issue. Your parts look the same as my '69 (and similar to a C2 arm on the shelf), including the zerk that gets lubed from underneath.
my initial problem was a squeak when you pressed the clutch pedal. the problem was the rod from the pedal was scraping the top of the hole in the firewall.
The bell arm has 2 different length arms on it. The long arm side was attached to rod that goes to the pedal. The shorter arm is the one that should have been attached to it. Basically someone welded it together wrong. Odds are yours is too.... how do I know? I spent more than a few days maintaining our shop trucks growing up - all were manual. All had that zert on the top of the bell crank.
So I took a chance, I took it apart, turn the arm around (so the long part goes to the clutch fork).... and now the clutch works perfectly (and no squeaking).
I bet someone at GM never realized the that because you could easily weld that together either way and it would work.... the right way to do what I did would be to reweld those arms on the opposite side... but who has time for that? :3rd: this works, it just means there is no clip holding the ball in place on the frame side. Also, for many cars the zert fitting would get knocked off when you used the clutch.....
In the grand scheme of the universe this clutch arm discussion isn't terribly important, so we'll just have to respectfully disagree. IMO the arms seem to be in the correct position for leverage/travel, and the holes in the arms are in the correct place for attaching the return and anti-rattle springs, and the bottom position zerk allows lubing while under the car greasing the suspension.
I'm halfway through construction of an aluminum replacement for the stock clutch bellcrank, but I've found that my spare bellcrank that I was going to use to configure my welding jig is an early C2 unit, which has a different angle between the two arms.
I must be getting old but I am in love with my LS1, as i dream about cars the LS series is all i am think about.....factory engineered, lots of power right from the start. thats a really hard combination to beat. it doesnt have the pedigree as you said but reliability, solid engineering and lots of power does have its place.i.....- but it's issues really make me question why I didn't simply buy a crate LS3 or LS7... the motor mounts for the C5 are still on the cradle.....
I must be getting old but I am in love with my LS1, as i dream about cars the LS series is all i am think about.....factory engineered, lots of power right from the start. thats a really hard combination to beat. it doesnt have the pedigree as you said but reliability, solid engineering and lots of power does have its place.i.....- but it's issues really make me question why I didn't simply buy a crate LS3 or LS7... the motor mounts for the C5 are still on the cradle.....
I'm from that tween generation that didn't have BBC's because they took too much fuel*, but then got into computer stuff because it's what was out there... my suspicion is there no reason why the BBC can't be as reliable as an LS - but I just don't have the experience with them and it's frustrating. That said, I'm a huge fan of building the motor for the car - and big bore, good flow and short stroke seem to me to be the right idea. I don't know an LS head that flows 320 cfm... add to it the canted valves which should give better flow (and this isn't my words - the guy who owns Westech Dyno said it)... but we'll see, also, with even spaced ports, the BBC headers are easier to adapt to the LS.... not that I didn't think about that too...
*actually, I had 2 BB 67 Camaros (not factory), and thought they were dogs. But I didn't put either motor together, and (love my dad to pieces) but he was known for trying to detune what I built because my mom browbeat him... now that I've built this 427 he's been a huge fan because it's out of my mom's jurisdiction.






oh, and tested today.... 111db at 50' and 6000 rpm... I'd love ideas on how to quiet it without corking it (or losing the sidepipes).... my initial thought is Supertrap disks...
Many variants and prices - will require some "sleuthing." mg]
oh, and tested today.... 111db at 50' and 6000 rpm... I'd love ideas on how to quiet it without corking it (or losing the sidepipes).... my initial thought is Supertrap disks...
mg]
oh, and tested today.... 111db at 50' and 6000 rpm... I'd love ideas on how to quiet it without corking it (or losing the sidepipes).... my initial thought is Supertrap disks...
was that with the car moving or standing still?
what is it at idle up to say 2500 rpm? thats really when you will be going from standing still to moving, 111 db at 50 and 6000 rpm can only last for fraction of a second when its moving. what is the state regulations? and what is is inside the cabin at 6000 rpm?
my son took my 69 with side pipes to the ice cream shop parked out front got his ice cream, ate it then went back to the car and started it up and made the little kids cry, the dads were all laughing and he was apologizing....
to be clear about a few things.
1) I drink the GM Koolaid but don't think they're perfect
2) I love the LS motor, fact is my goal with the 64 Buick wagon is to tow my Corvette with it (and it's powered by a 6.0 LS motor.)
3) I know Manuel, he's a great guy but a bit shifty.
and in the effort to modernize the BB, next up is a coil-on-plug set up
https://www.holley.com/products/ignition/ignition_boxes/street/parts/60151
and port injection
I'm also going to send the Chinesium heads packing when the funds become available (and might build another 427 based on a Dart block).... future plans. Not giving up on my idea.
mg]
Several of the Western road courses have db limits. We have one locally (Arizona Motorsports Park) that has a 96 db drive-by limit, and I can't pass it with anything I own. Some guys use Super Trapps and then turn the tip of the tail pipe 90 degrees away from the drive-by test stand. Doesn't help with side pipes.
I get it now...**** were I live there arent even any car shows not to mention no road courses.......there are coffee and cars type shows for guys with Mclarens, Ferraris, NSXs...etc. its almost the worst place ever for being a car guy.
this is why you're my hero.mg]
oh, and tested today.... 111db at 50' and 6000 rpm... I'd love ideas on how to quiet it without corking it (or losing the sidepipes).... my initial thought is Supertrap disks...
was that with the car moving or standing still?
what is it at idle up to say 2500 rpm? thats really when you will be going from standing still to moving, 111 db at 50 and 6000 rpm can only last for fraction of a second when its moving. what is the state regulations? and what is is inside the cabin at 6000 rpm?
my son took my 69 with side pipes to the ice cream shop parked out front got his ice cream, ate it then went back to the car and started it up and made the little kids cry, the dads were all laughing and he was apologizing....
Several of the Western road courses have db limits. We have one locally (Arizona Motorsports Park) that has a 96 db drive-by limit, and I can't pass it with anything I own. Some guys use Super Trapps and then turn the tip of the tail pipe 90 degrees away from the drive-by test stand. Doesn't help with side pipes.
nice, do you have to pump the oil exchange or is some sort of siphon or gravity heat rise system? what is the third hole for temp sensor or vent?
and yes, I spent a lot of money solving a problem I didn't have..... ah well, the trolls get a laugh.
376 to the tire
for the record... we didn't mess with the timing.edited It has 18* initial then I think 20 mechanical... at this point it's not knocking and the motor is still 'new' .... safe tune get some more miles under it and maybe I'll revisit the timing.... I have my eye on the coil per cylinder conversion.....edited
376 to the tire
for the record... we didn't mess with the timing.edited It has 18* initial then I think 20 mechanical... at this point it's not knocking and the motor is still 'new' .... safe tune get some more miles under it and maybe I'll revisit the timing.... I have my eye on the coil per cylinder conversion.....edited
thats pretty awesome especially if you havent dialed in the timing. i am sure there is some hidden power in optimizing the timing.
I don't know where in "class" your car fits - but the aft exhaust could blow a diffuser for some DF.