Norval is a hell of an engineer, no question, and I am receipient of mucho help from him over some long time now....hated to see him disappear....
guess he got bored with all the posting and 'tudes'.....
he felt the Jeep box was better than a rack, but well I did my own rack before anyone made any kits or other conversions....mine was on the road a year before anyone sold rack kit ONE....built my conversion from a very OLD series of pix dating back to the old UUNet days where Idar Anderson from northern Europe...did a Saab 900? rack into a shark, i'ts the '92 Grand Am rack so popular here in the states, Identical...but I didn't know that for some time, then someone said something and it was off to the junkyards in '01 and found my solution in '02 and on the car for testing...took several attempts to get it right, but it's been in there some 6 years now street driven daily....all sorts or roads and speeds...most of them quicker....
so the concept is not mine but Steeroids was also reading the information I had and went commercial with it....
my install is superior....
I never did a Jeep box conversion, nor driven one, so can't comment.....
all I know is ONE huge nice thing is the night/day feel of the car on the road, plenty of feedback even with the power assist, due to rack design not a recirc ball, IMO.....then the 2.7 turns lock to lock at 12-1 ratio than the OEM design at 16-1 ratio or 4 turns l-l.....
I feel the problems in differant opinions come from primarily wheels and tires ...
pecking order
wheels tires
steering ratio
suspensions....
and so with everyone doing their own thing, opinions vary widely, VERY widely....
:bounce: