Speaking of aerodynamics...

clutchdust

Millionaire Playboy
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
1,726
Location
In transition
I've often heard our cars (c3) have been compared aerodynamically to a brick wall. I did an unofficial comparison the other day and believe it might be a bit of an exaggeration.
I have occasion to visit a town about 70 miles west of here and to get there I have to cross a mountain ridge. Because I'm cheap, I like to shift to neutral on the way down and just allow the engine to idle. I do this in my 5000# GMC 1500 and I constantly slow down without even needing to ride the brakes. However, when I do the same thing in the c3, weighing in around 3600# at the top of the mountain, I'm doing about 60 at the top of the mountain. I have to ride the brakes to keep it around 90 by the time I get to the bottom. In fact, when I did it last week I traveled almost four miles farther down the mountain in the c3 than I do in my truck before I drop below 60mph. So, it may not be all that aerodynamic in the wind tunnel, but apparently gravity likes it just fine.
 
Mechanical Drag vs Aerodynamic Drag
Due to the GMC 1500 vehicle weight and the the type of tires, your Tire Drag is significant. Probably accounts for a large part of the difference.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top