Belgian1979vette
Well-known member
Okay, this is a discussion going on, but i'm looking for people that had actual problems with a Fluidampr.
The story goes that Fluidampr's break off the nose of a crank and many racers seem to be advise against them in favor of the ATI's (elastomer).
However, I haven't found any real proof of a broken off nose, so this kinda seems like the story of HV pumps sucking oil pans dry.
Anyone here have any real life data on this ?
I currently have a Fluidampr that I choose because the components in my engine differ substantially from stock and I wanted to make sure the balancing range was wide enough. If however the fluidampr is actually a problem i have no problem switching, unless this is one of those tales spread on the inet.
The story goes that Fluidampr's break off the nose of a crank and many racers seem to be advise against them in favor of the ATI's (elastomer).
However, I haven't found any real proof of a broken off nose, so this kinda seems like the story of HV pumps sucking oil pans dry.
Anyone here have any real life data on this ?
I currently have a Fluidampr that I choose because the components in my engine differ substantially from stock and I wanted to make sure the balancing range was wide enough. If however the fluidampr is actually a problem i have no problem switching, unless this is one of those tales spread on the inet.